90-Day Suspension: The Disciplinary Case of Noam Jay Cohen

a wooden gaven sitting on top of a white counter

In the legal profession, a lawyer’s conduct during litigation is governed by strict rules of professionalism and respect for the judiciary. When an attorney’s behavior crosses the line into aggression or negligence toward court orders, the Florida Supreme Court acts to maintain the integrity of the bar. For Miami-based debt collection attorney Noam Jay Cohen (Florida Bar No. 271240), recent courtroom conduct has resulted in a significant professional sanction.

Effective January 15, 2026, the Florida Supreme Court issued an order (Case No. SC2025-1998) suspending Cohen from the practice of law for 90 days.

 The Core Misconduct: Aggressive Behavior and Negligence

The disciplinary action followed a Conditional Guilty Plea and consent judgment regarding a series of events in a debt collection matter. According to Florida Bar disciplinary records, the primary findings included:

  • Courtroom Aggression: During a virtual hearing against a pro se (self-represented) individual, Cohen conducted himself in an “aggressive manner.” The behavior was severe enough that the presiding judge was forced to disconnect the virtual hearing.

  • Disrespect to the Judiciary: Cohen subsequently accused the judge of bias and “ignorance of legal standards” after the judge granted the debtor’s claim of exemption.

  • Negligent Filing: Following the hearing, Cohen filed a motion for final judgment seeking to garnish the debtor’s wages. In doing so, he failed to review the court’s written order, which had already granted the debtor’s exemption, thereby disregarding the court’s authority.

 Professional Standing and Status

Noam Jay Cohen has been a licensed member of the Florida Bar since 2000, practicing primarily in North Miami Beach and Miami. Until this recent sanction, he was a long-standing member of the South Florida legal community specializing in debt collection.

As of February 2026, his status with the Florida Bar is listed as “Suspended” and “Not Eligible to Practice Law in Florida.” The suspension is a “non-rehabilitative” sanction, meaning he is eligible for automatic reinstatement once the 90-day period concludes, provided he meets all other court-mandated conditions.

 Requirements of the 2026 Suspension Order

The Supreme Court’s order carries strict mandates that Cohen must follow to remain in good standing for future reinstatement:

  1. Cease All Practice: Cohen was required to close his practice, notify all current clients, and stop representing himself as a Florida attorney by the January 15 effective date.

  2. Professionalism Workshop: He is required to attend a Professionalism Workshop in person within six months of the court’s order.

  3. Affidavit of Compliance: Under Rule 3-5.1(h), he must provide a sworn affidavit to the Florida Bar confirming that he has notified all relevant parties (clients, courts, and opposing counsel) of his suspension.

  4. Financial Penalty: The court entered a judgment for $1,250.00 in disciplinary costs payable to the Florida Bar.

Conclusion: Preserving Courtroom Decorum

The case of Noam Jay Cohen serves as a reminder that the “adversarial” nature of law does not excuse a lack of professional courtesy. By suspending an attorney for aggressive behavior and the failure to respect judicial orders, the Florida Supreme Court reinforces that every litigant—especially those representing themselves—deserves a respectful and fair proceeding. For those checking the current status of any Florida legal professional, the Florida Bar Member Search remains the definitive resource.

Share the Post:

Related Posts